Or are the achievements comparable to the gold medal in the olympics? Is cheating to get achievements the same a using performance enhancers in sports to win? Is it strictly necessary to have these achievements that attract 'cheaters'? But this game would have a lot less cheaters if it wasn't for the achievements. Jesus christ, this alters the perspective of myself. I don't consider myself a cheater, so in retro perspective I'm shocked over myself.

I would not have used a helper if it wasn't for the achievements, and by the looks of it this was also the reason for hundreds of other people. Should developers take learning in this? Or is it fair to include achievements that only a small percentage of the players will get? They even discuss how it must be used in moderation to avoid ban. I'm not saying it was anyone elses fault but mine, but what did the devs expect when they included these achievements? By looking at different forums it seems like almost every achievement hunter have used a helper. I feel rotten for ruining the experience for others.) (I think I know what this feeling is now. So I 'cheated', and with that I was ruining the game for others who tried to win fair and square.

Continue to play a game that I only find mildly entertaining.

Atleast for my part.Īnd so, from here on out there are 4 paths: So here I am, an achievement hunter, looking at unoptainable achievements. This is something I have never achieved in any game. You have to place 1st once, top 10 ten times, and reach place number 250 in the hourly leaderboards.

So this game has leaderboard achievements. What is this feeling? Guilt? You made me cheat. For the first time in over a decade I actually cheated in a game.

Wordament achievement android glitch